Proof row
Registry is curated, not automatic
The current registry is intentionally curated and raw experiment assets still require redaction before publication.
Supports the boundary between launch proof organization and future automated ingestion.
Measured pilot · Measured pilot
A team has many experiments and needs a shared way to compare them without turning the site into a folder of disconnected artifacts.
registry map
HERMES case-study frame
A reviewer should be able to answer seven things before opening the JSON export: what decision is in front of them, what changed against a cold start, which row carries the claim, where the value appears, what source trail exists, what purchase decision it informs, and what the case does not prove.
A team has many experiments and needs a shared way to compare them without turning the site into a folder of disconnected artifacts.
Each demo has its own layout, vocabulary, maturity level, and proof standard.
Every demo becomes a proof case with the same claim, use case, evidence, limitation, and CTA shape.
The first registry is curated, not automatically generated.
Proof row
The current registry is intentionally curated and raw experiment assets still require redaction before publication.
Supports the boundary between launch proof organization and future automated ingestion.
Evidence room
This is the public review surface for the case. Each row names the observation, the evidence values it stands on, the source trail, the boundary, and the matching structured entry in the evidence export.
A source trail is not always a raw public artifact. Public projection means the source has been redrawn or summarized; retained source means it is named for audit but withheld until redaction clears.
Claim under review
The value is accumulation. New tests become comparable because they enter the same frame.
evidence_facts[0] The first registry is curated, not automatically generated.
evidence_facts[1] Raw experiment assets require redaction before publication.
evidence_facts[2] The first registry is curated, not automatically generated.
Evidence values
Source trail
source-01-demo-registry Demo registry public projection · public projection source-02-validation-script Validation script build gate · public projection Evidence status mix
Metrics
Source artifacts
Case quality review
This is a cold-review rubric, not a sales claim. It checks whether the case can be understood, inspected, bounded, and acted on.
A reviewer gets the situation, contrast, and buyer decision without reading the JSON.
The case exposes proof rows, values, source handles, and excerpts before the JSON export.
The page names what the case proves and what it does not prove.
The route uses visuals, storyboards, or surface frames to break the proof into inspectable layers.
The proof sends the buyer to an evidence room, artifact link, pricing path, or local run.
Cold-audience clarity: Tighten the opening latch or before/after language when the case still needs explanation.
Open case evidenceEvidence docket
Evidence Flow
Each case has to survive the same path: starting condition, system-backed change, visible result, retained evidence, stated limitation, and a next action.
Claim
The value is accumulation. New tests become comparable because they enter the same frame.
Before / after
Before · artifact collection
Each demo has its own layout, vocabulary, maturity level, and proof standard.
Interesting work exists, but visitors cannot tell what is proven and what is just promising.
After · shared app surface
Every demo becomes a proof case with the same claim, use case, evidence, limitation, and CTA shape.
The studio turns accumulated experiments into a browsable product proof system.
Evidence
Run metadata
Metrics
Source artifacts
Limitations
Next